153M+ US & Canada drivers licenses leaked on the dark web
153M+ US & Canada drivers licenses leaked on the dark web
153M+ US & Canada drivers licenses leaked on the dark web
To drive up demand for old computers and laptops, we can simply inform the public about specific CPUs made before the spychips (~2008 for the Intel ME & 2013 for AMD PSP)
Is there a spychip in any of the AMD Steamroller-based chips? Kaveri? Wikipedia apparently has misinfo on this.
Is there a spychip in any of the Steamroller-based chips? Kaveri? Wikipedia apparently has misinfo on this.
USB-PD PSU almost thrown away because it would not charge a simple bicycle light
They are microprocessors embedded within the microprocessor. Intel’s IME enables remote access (by intel’s own admission). If you are not a corporation who manages a fleet of machines, the backdoor can only be used against you. AMD’s variant called the PSP is similar but closed-source. We don’t really have a complete picture of the extent of the compromise with AMD because of the opacity of it (as AMD proactively denied a request for source code). What we don’t know /can/ hurt us, as we already got stung by a defective driver for the AMD’s PSP.
Even if the spychips were to be hypothetically designed to be aligned with the interests of non-corporate individual consumers, there is no such thing as bug-free software. They have added complexity that works against us and brings vulnerabilities. And we also cannot dispense of the deliberate design whereby some remote actor decides for the user what software is or is not “authorised” to execute. I alone should decide what is authorised on my PC.
So the fix is to use an AMD processor made before ~2014 (roughly speaking), or a pre-2009 intel. AMD chips were behind intel in terms of performance, but probably not 5 years behind. So I figure 2013 AMDs are the most interesting. But we only have a fuzzy idea of which AMD chips are spychip-free.